Links to Active Worldocean Consulting Web Sites

This blog is no longer active, mainly because it does not easily support tables, graphs, etc. Please visit the Worldocean Consulting Ltd web site as well as Worldocean Consulting's Scribd.com web site for a comprehensive selection of Gerald Graham's postings and publications, past and present.

X Prize Foundation Oil Cleanup Challenge

The X Prize Foundation has just announced its latest competition- the Oil Cleanup X Challenge.

Basically, the competition will reward teams from around the world that come up with the most innovative solutions to removing spilled oil from the surface of the ocean, at the spill site. Offshore E&P and tankers are among the spill sources for which cleanup solutions are sought.

Proposals will be evaluated by a team of experts. The top teams will then demonstrate their solutions at the OHMSETT oil spill testing facility in New Jersey, USA. The winning team gets $1 Million, the runner up $300,000, and the third place finisher $100,000. Teams are invited to pre-register now, with the final rules for the competition being posted in September of this year. The competition will be open until April, 2011.

As for the X Prize Foundation, readers may recall that several years ago they launched a $10 million competition ( the Ansari X Prize ) to build a small spacecraft capable of transporting three people 100 kms above the earth's surface. The current competition is called the Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup X Challenge, after the competition's benefactor, who is the President of the Schmidt Family Foundation, which supports the development of clean energy and the wise use of natural resources.

X Prize Foundation Launches Oil Spill Competition

The X Prize Foundation in the United States is offering a $USD 1.4 million prize for the best solution to cleaning up oil spills at sea. Click here for details on the year-long competition, including how to enter your team.

Why Isn't the MV Arca in the Gulf?

The MV Arca, a dedicated Dutch oil skimming vessel which I had the good fortune to tour in Brest, France in 2002, is the most advanced oil spill response vessel in the world. The vessel, which was built in 1998, operates using two sweeping arms, one on each side of the vessel, which allow oil on the water's surface to be corralled and skimmed on board, where the water in the oil/water mixture will be separated out before being discharged back into the ocean.

The MV Arca has a storage capacity of 1080 m3; that translates into 6792 barrels of oil. When storage capacity is reached, the oil can easily and quickly be transferred to another vessel for eventual disposal and/or recycling onshore. The sweeping arms can recover 240 m3/hr, or 1509 barrels/hr, and can be operated when the waves are six feet high or more. In order to operate effectively, the MV Arca requires aerial guidance to direct it into areas where the oil is of a certain thickness- the MV Arca works best when the oil is thicker. Thus, effective operation of the MV Arca requires oil of a certain thickness, plus good logistical coordination between spotter planes, the MV Arca and other 'receiving' vessels.

The ability of the vessel to separate the water from the oil is a key feature of the MV Arca, since typically the oil/water mixture that is recovered at sea after an incident consists mainly of water. In other words, if you can separate the oil from the water at sea, and just store the oil on board, then you can significantly increase the amount of oil recovered in any given day, and save a lot of time, effort and money in the process. Otherwise, the voluminous oil/water mixture has to be transferred to a shore-based facility where separation can occur. But for the system to really work effectively, the quality of the 'effluent' has to be good enough such that it can be discharged back into the sea. Even Kevin Costner's now famous centrifugal oil spill separation system has only been able to get the oil content in the treated oil/water mixture down to 80 ppm, which is well below the international Marpol standard of 15 ppm. Until such time as the lower figure is achieved, Costner's oil and water will both have to be stored on board, which kind of defeats the purpose of separating the water out of it at sea.

But if the MV Arca is so efficient and effective, then why isn't she in the Gulf? Well, it's absence cannot, apparently, be explained by the infamous US Jones Act, which bars foreign commercial vessels from transporting merchandise between American ports. There is, in fact, an exemption from this requirement for foreign oil spill response vessels, and fifteen other foreign oil spill vessels are said to be operating in the Gulf as we speak as a result of this waiver. So, if it's not the Jones Act holding the MV Arca back, what is? Two possible explanations have been advanced. First, I am told by Sjon Huisman, a Dutch oil spill response expert with the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, that the current practice of mixing the escaping Deepwater Horizon oil with dispersants at a depth of five miles makes mechanical recovery of oil on the surface very difficult, because the oil that eventually does surface from the seabed forms a very thin layer. Second, as with Kevin Costner's centrifugal system, a British colleague of mine claims that the oily water that the MV Arca discharges back into the sea apparently fails to meet the international Marpol standard of 15 ppm of oil as well.

It should be pointed out that while the MV Arca has not been deployed to the Gulf, the US has accepted a Dutch offer of six pairs of the same type of sweeping arms that are employed on the MV Arca. These are being used close to shore, mounted on hopper dredgers, tankers or any other vessels with large storage capacity, according to another Dutch colleague intimately familiar with the MV Arca.

But are the two reasons given above for the MV Arca's absence from the Gulf really plausible? For one thing, if it were deployed to the region, perhaps those vast quantities of controversial subsea dispersants would no longer be used on the spill. And as for the claim that the quality of the oily water discharged by the MV Arca fails to meet international Marpol standards, this appears to be somewhat of a red herring. For, as Mr. Huisman explains, the 'decanted' water is pumped overboard well in front of the sweep, so that if there is oil in it, it can be recovered in a second sweep. Moreover, if the quality of water the MV Arca water discharges is good enough for Europe, the home base of the vessel, then why isn't it good enough for the Gulf?

It's all rather hard to take, really. Just imagine how much oil this super-modern vessel could have recovered from the Gulf if it had been working there for the past fifty days or so in the immediate vicinity of the Deepwater Horizon incident site. Put another way, just think how much oil could have been prevented from spreading and emulsifying, some of it eventually ending up on shore, if the American authorities had done a Net Environmental Benefit Analysis, and concluded that overall the effect of the MV Arca's operations on the marine environment would be overwhelmingly positive, as most certainly seems to be the case.

It's a shame, really, and it puts paid to the claim that both BP and the US authorities are pulling out all the stops to contain the spill and mitigate the damage from it. If that were true, wouldn't they have commissioned the MV Arca long ago? In short, this looks like just another instance of ineptitude on the part of Deepwater Horizon Unified Command, which includes the US Coast Guard, BP, NOAA and the EPA.

Is 'Unified Command' Partly to Blame for the Confused Federal Deepwater Horizon Response Effort

One of the issues the recently-established Presidential Commission into the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster should look into is the US command structure for major oil spill response. Major deficiencies in the way this system is designed could go some way to explaining the somewhat confused federal response to this catastrophic incident.

The US employs the Unified Command system for coordinating federal response to incidents such as this. This organisational structure was started in California for use in fighting forest fires. It has since been adapted for use around the world in the case of all types of emergencies, from earthquakes to hurricanes, e.g. Katrina. The way the system works is that a phalanx of fourteen government departments sit around a table, each with veto power over decisionmaking. There is an Incident Commander, appointed from the Coast Guard, but on paper at least this official has little sway over the various other departments involved, such as NOAA, EPA, OSHA, Fish and Wildlife, National Parks, MMS, not to mention the various Gulf states with interests in the spill. In effect, each of these agencies operates as the final authority within their area of jurisdiction and responsibility. In other words, while there is a certain degree of coordination between them, each agency operates within its own little 'silo'. No one tells anyone what to do, and everyone just informs everyone else of what they intend to do. The potentially disastrous consequences of such a control structure were no more evident than in the case of the 2005 Katrina hurricane disaster which struck the Gulf, where chaos was the order of the day. The current Gulf spill response effort is nowhere near as bad as Katrina, but obvious deficiencies at the core of the system linger five years later.

The American incident response regime contrasts sharply with the Canadian model, which is simply called Incident Command. The Canadian response model is a much more muscular Command and Control structure, with Coast Guard playing the role of Lead Agency, supported by numerous other federal departments, and with virtually no role for the provinces, such as British Columbia. Other departments and levels of government may not like the Canadian model- in fact, some downright detest it, but on balance it does tend to cut through the red tape and allow for quick, decisive action and leadership.

It is of course too early to tell whether the US Unified Command response model is to blame for confusion and tardiness with respect to numerous contentious issues such as subsea dispersant use, estimating the spill size, the existence of underwater plumes, to name but a few. Nevertheless, the Presidential commission does provide an opportunity to evaluate the system to see whether it helped or hampered the response effort in this particular case.

US Now "Owns the Podium" with Respect to Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Now that the US Dept. of Justice has launched a criminal investigation into BP's conduct with respect to the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig fire, explosion and ensuing oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the tone of the US's government's attitude to BP has changed noticeably. For one thing, USCG Vice-Admiral Mary Landry has been stood down from her duties with respect to the spill response operation- from now on she'll be dealing with preparations for the oncoming hurricane season in the Gulf. Also, we are told there will be no more joint US Govt-BP press conferences. Instead, USCG Admiral Thad Allen will be the prime spokesperson for anything to do with the spill. Apparently, then, the US government is seeking to 'own the podium', some forty-five days into the spill response operation.

In other words, the rather cozy relationship that we've seen thus far between the Repsonsible Party, aka "The Polluter" and the Incident Commmander, in the form of the Coast Guard head, has ended. There's no way the Coast Guard and BP could be seen standing shoulder to shoulder when BP itself is under criminal investigation for its conduct before, during and after the incident which occurred on April 20, 2010, when the rig caught fire and exploded as a result of a blowout, with the loss of ten lives. How this seachange will affect the spill response operation on the ground is anyone's guess, since the government is still dependent upon the oilpatch for much of the subsea expertise and equipment, but it does reflect increasing exasperation on the part of the White House with respect to BP's handling of the spill. Chances are the public and private sectors will continue to cooperate, since they have little choice but to do so, really, but on the public level the optics will be substantially different. And with the Coast Guard's Thad Allen now become the public face of the BP spill, there is now the risk that if yet another attempt to stem the leak fails, the public will increasingly blame the government for the entire fiasco rather than the actual polluter.

The Tyee Chooses "Marine Oil Spills" Blog as Its Blog of the Week

The Tyee, British Columbia, Canada's number one online newspaper, has chosen this blog, with its recent extensive coverage of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, as its Blog of the Week. Thanks to Crawford Kilian for noticing us. This blog has also been selected as one of the Tyee's Top Ten Gulf Oil Spill Sites